Published September 11, 2008
Review: Bangkok Dangerous
2
 
0

Whoa, did some graphics arts guy splice a Nicolas Cage profile onto a The Fast and the Furious poster? No, it’s a new movie called Bangkok Dangerous, filled with gunfights, explosions, and everything else Nicolas Cage likes to do when he’s not being The Weather Man.

Not knowing anything about it going in, one would expect nothing more than a film filled with macho gun-slinging scenes that the all-too-done- before poster depicts. And, rest assured, you will not be disappointed in the levels of machismo. However, underneath all the noise and shrapnel lays a little bit of heart — a story, of a man Joe (Nicolas Cage) who aspires to escape a long life of being an invisible assassin. Now, with four final hits to do in Bangkok, he has his chance. He’ll take the money from the hits and disappear from his infamous movie character career (e.g. the assassins of Kill Bill, The Bourne Trilogy, Mr. & Mrs. Smith, Road to Perdition, Collateral, and so on).

Of course, something goes wrong, because otherwise we wouldn’t have a story. Joe meets that something in the form of a love interest. Her name is Fon (Charlie Yeungat), an employee of a local Bangkok pharmacy who helps Joe tend his latest wound. To Joe’s surprise, Fon is deaf and unable to speak. This temporary barrier draws him closer to her as the two outsiders’ lives collide. As Joe falls more in love, his attention to his work fades and he starts getting sloppy. Is it worth checking out? Well, if you have free movie passes that expire this week, then sure... Bangkok Dangerous offers a few things worth seeing. There’s the whole generation hand-off theme as Joe teaches his young assistant Kong (Shahkrit Yamnarm) his complex killing trade, and the film does explore some interesting views with the camera (though, if you like the color red, skip this film, because it doesn’t appear throughout the entire 99 minute running time; it’s a very blue movie).

IMDb gives it a “6.2,” but that’s just being polite; anything over a five would be too generous. But, for a modern day action movie, it definitely could’ve been worse. Sylvester Stallone could have starred in it and it could have been called Rambo: Bangkok.

No comments so far. Add yours.

© 2010 Reporter Magazine. All Rights Reserved.